<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 &#8211; Which Is The Fastest?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecom Consultant</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-5256</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-5256</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using my e-90 on AT&amp;T in the US for two weeks now. Previously tried a 9500 (abandoned because of poor coverage - no 850 GSM), and a Cingular branded 9300.

For the past 5 years I&#039;ve been using a string of forever-upgrading Windows Mobile devices. Our company is on an Exchange Server, and the e-mail, contacts, and calender syncing was great. However, very mediocre phones. The touchscreen, while great for some things, is terrible for one-handed operations. The Bluetooth on every HTC device I&#039;ve owned was intermittent, dropping calls at the most inopportune times, and the reception was never great.

I like the idea of the communicator, and the Activesync application finally sold me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using my e-90 on AT&amp;T in the US for two weeks now. Previously tried a 9500 (abandoned because of poor coverage &#8211; no 850 GSM), and a Cingular branded 9300.</p>
<p>For the past 5 years I&#8217;ve been using a string of forever-upgrading Windows Mobile devices. Our company is on an Exchange Server, and the e-mail, contacts, and calender syncing was great. However, very mediocre phones. The touchscreen, while great for some things, is terrible for one-handed operations. The Bluetooth on every HTC device I&#8217;ve owned was intermittent, dropping calls at the most inopportune times, and the reception was never great.</p>
<p>I like the idea of the communicator, and the Activesync application finally sold me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phreek</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>Phreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>Hi! I am an another long time T9 fan. I deliberately chose E66 over E71, because I like the nice big keys that T9 phones offer, let alone their (especially E66&#039;s) design and lack of pancakeness. Just imagine typing or dialling on the tiny QWERTY keys with your thick gloves on when there&#039;s -20 Celsius outside! - it&#039;s not too easy, but well possible with larger keys.

I tried these test texts too. I mostly type in my native language, Estonian, but a couple of tries to get the feel and 46 seconds for the first text and 23 for the second. Again, T9 FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I am an another long time T9 fan. I deliberately chose E66 over E71, because I like the nice big keys that T9 phones offer, let alone their (especially E66&#8242;s) design and lack of pancakeness. Just imagine typing or dialling on the tiny QWERTY keys with your thick gloves on when there&#8217;s -20 Celsius outside! &#8211; it&#8217;s not too easy, but well possible with larger keys.</p>
<p>I tried these test texts too. I mostly type in my native language, Estonian, but a couple of tries to get the feel and 46 seconds for the first text and 23 for the second. Again, T9 FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik Chronicles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nokia E71 &#8211; A Detailed Look</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2980</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Chronicles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nokia E71 &#8211; A Detailed Look</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2980</guid>
		<description>[...] eliminates lots and really lots of errors when you are typing. Its ideal for a really long email. Vaibhav Sharma of thesymbianblog has a nice post that details his comparision of text typing speed o.... But I have to say I miss typing without looking at the keypad. Since I am a college guy,I tend to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eliminates lots and really lots of errors when you are typing. Its ideal for a really long email. Vaibhav Sharma of thesymbianblog has a nice post that details his comparision of text typing speed o&#8230;. But I have to say I miss typing without looking at the keypad. Since I am a college guy,I tend to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Qwerty</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2563</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Qwerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2563</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by beach on 2008-08-24  E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 - Which Is The Fastest?  http://thesymbianblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/ - bookmarked by 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 2 members originally found by beach on 2008-08-24  E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 &#8211; Which Is The Fastest?  <a href="http://thesymbianblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/" rel="nofollow">http://thesymbianblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/</a> &#8211; bookmarked by 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta737</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Delta737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>My problem with T9 is that I regularly type words it doesn&#039;t recognize (e.g. names). The time it takes too find out that it doesn&#039;t know the word, than correcting it so that spelling will be the easiest, and then actually spelling the word itself takes SO much time, that I say, QWERTY for ever (that&#039;s why I bought the E90 too replace my N95 - thinking about an E71 now). A lot of friends I know don&#039;t even use T9 (on their &quot;dumb-phones&quot;) because they find that T9 &quot;never&quot; predicts the word they mean (and use the old multi-tap system)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with T9 is that I regularly type words it doesn&#8217;t recognize (e.g. names). The time it takes too find out that it doesn&#8217;t know the word, than correcting it so that spelling will be the easiest, and then actually spelling the word itself takes SO much time, that I say, QWERTY for ever (that&#8217;s why I bought the E90 too replace my N95 &#8211; thinking about an E71 now). A lot of friends I know don&#8217;t even use T9 (on their &#8220;dumb-phones&#8221;) because they find that T9 &#8220;never&#8221; predicts the word they mean (and use the old multi-tap system)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confronto Scrittura Con Nokia E71, Nokia E90 E Nokia N95 Con T9. Quale Il Piu Rapido? - 3 sul Blog - Tech, Fun e Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Confronto Scrittura Con Nokia E71, Nokia E90 E Nokia N95 Con T9. Quale Il Piu Rapido? - 3 sul Blog - Tech, Fun e Web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>[...] via [TheSymbianBlog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [TheSymbianBlog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jujupang</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>jujupang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>Oh, thks, that&#039;s simple enough. ***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thks, that&#8217;s simple enough. ***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaibhav Sharma</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaibhav Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Hi&#039; just hit * once you spell the word out. (Make sure the you see the underline)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8217; just hit * once you spell the word out. (Make sure the you see the underline)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jujupang</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>jujupang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Just got N95-3 and having trouble with T9 as compared to previous SE W810i.  While trying the test above, when trying to type &quot;role&quot;, Nokia&#039;s T9 kept on coming up with &quot;sold&quot;, how to I check if there other word choices?  I had to clear the word and hit # and then spell &quot;role&quot;, I know there must be a predictive way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Just got N95-3 and having trouble with T9 as compared to previous SE W810i.  While trying the test above, when trying to type &#8220;role&#8221;, Nokia&#8217;s T9 kept on coming up with &#8220;sold&#8221;, how to I check if there other word choices?  I had to clear the word and hit # and then spell &#8220;role&#8221;, I know there must be a predictive way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwikan</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwikan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>I started with usual T9 phones and found them quite quick except when I came to entering odd items, or for words I cannot remember how to spell. So, I went to an E61 and found the keyboard small, but overall pretty good. Then I went to E90, which has the two keyboards. For short sms I use the T9, but for emails or long sms the internal is still the best and I would choose over any of the smaller keyboards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started with usual T9 phones and found them quite quick except when I came to entering odd items, or for words I cannot remember how to spell. So, I went to an E61 and found the keyboard small, but overall pretty good. Then I went to E90, which has the two keyboards. For short sms I use the T9, but for emails or long sms the internal is still the best and I would choose over any of the smaller keyboards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qwerty vs T9 @ NGagePT.net</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Qwerty vs T9 @ NGagePT.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 - Which Is The Fastest? @ The Symbian Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 &#8211; Which Is The Fastest? @ The Symbian Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T9 Nav: The Next Killer Application For S60 &#171; The Symbian Blog</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>T9 Nav: The Next Killer Application For S60 &#171; The Symbian Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>[...] E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 - Which Is The&#160;Fastest? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] E71 v/s E90 v/s T9 &#8211; Which Is The&nbsp;Fastest? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>Nice test, bur the conclusion seems wrong (from my perspective). It should be like this. For plain text, NO difference. For the mixed text, T9 is at most 11% slower than qwerty, no BIG deal. It would have been if it starting approaching 50%, but it didn&#039;t. So I will happily go with T9 on a phone and qwerty on my laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice test, bur the conclusion seems wrong (from my perspective). It should be like this. For plain text, NO difference. For the mixed text, T9 is at most 11% slower than qwerty, no BIG deal. It would have been if it starting approaching 50%, but it didn&#8217;t. So I will happily go with T9 on a phone and qwerty on my laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinski-</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinski-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2125</guid>
		<description>T9 sucks more one finnish language, unless ur purely writing literary language, wich makes u look dumb on im and irc-chat. However i still prefer to keep T9 mainly on on my E90, as it is handy for short sms. Longer messages and chats I always write qwerty open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T9 sucks more one finnish language, unless ur purely writing literary language, wich makes u look dumb on im and irc-chat. However i still prefer to keep T9 mainly on on my E90, as it is handy for short sms. Longer messages and chats I always write qwerty open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>NICE posting!!  Great comparison.  I&#039;ve found that I get about the same results, as well, when comparing my E61 with my old N95.  I love both qwerty AND t9, just the same.  They both have advantages and disadvantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NICE posting!!  Great comparison.  I&#8217;ve found that I get about the same results, as well, when comparing my E61 with my old N95.  I love both qwerty AND t9, just the same.  They both have advantages and disadvantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Fjelsten</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Fjelsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>One thing to consider: If you enter a lot of website addresses, predictive text does not help you. Here QWERTY is most definitely faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to consider: If you enter a lot of website addresses, predictive text does not help you. Here QWERTY is most definitely faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonnyBruha</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>JonnyBruha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>Oh, and 28 seconds on the second sample seconds. Once again, T9 FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and 28 seconds on the second sample seconds. Once again, T9 FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonnyBruha</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>JonnyBruha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>My first attempt at the sample sentence yielded 59 seconds on my N95-4. I&#039;ve reached a high speed of 71 WPM on iphonetypingtest.com on my N95-4 as well. It sounds like everyone needs to spend a little bit more time with T9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first attempt at the sample sentence yielded 59 seconds on my N95-4. I&#8217;ve reached a high speed of 71 WPM on iphonetypingtest.com on my N95-4 as well. It sounds like everyone needs to spend a little bit more time with T9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Fab ulous</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Fab ulous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>Vaibhav, try the 3 phones at:

http://www.iphonetypingtest.com/test-freeform.html

If you dont get the fastest speeds with the E90, you&#039;re doing something wrong. Unless you have very small hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaibhav, try the 3 phones at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iphonetypingtest.com/test-freeform.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.iphonetypingtest.com/test-freeform.html</a></p>
<p>If you dont get the fastest speeds with the E90, you&#8217;re doing something wrong. Unless you have very small hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E71 x E90 x T9 - Qual é o mais rápido para digitar? &#124; rodrigostoledo.com</title>
		<link>http://thehandheldblog.com/2008/08/03/e71-vs-e90-vs-t9-which-is-the-fastest/comment-page-1/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>E71 x E90 x T9 - Qual é o mais rápido para digitar? &#124; rodrigostoledo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vaibhavsharma.wordpress.com/?p=1184#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>[...] Para ler o texte completo visite o site The Symbian Blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Para ler o texte completo visite o site The Symbian Blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

